Vista SP1 vs XP SP2
Pessoal achei isto no Japplo mas foram realizados no forum Futuremark, estes testes interessantes entre o Windows Vista SP1 e o Windows XP SP2, dos quais os resultados foram inspiradores, o novo Service Pack 1 do Vista melhorou bastante a performance do Windows Vista...Configuração usada nos testes:
Core 2 Duo E6600 @ 3.2GHz (8*400)
Gigabyte GA-P35-DS3
8GB DDR2-800 4-5-4-15
GeForce 8800GT 512MB (stock)
Western Digital Caviar SE16 250GB <--- Vista Home Premium 64-bit SP1 Samsung SpinPoint T166 320GB <--- Windows XP Professional SP2
Teste:
File copy (6.3GB ISO from Samsung drive to WD drive):
Vista: 2min 48sec
XP: 3min 07sec
File extraction (extracting the Crysis patch zip file with WinRAR):
Vista: 14s
XP: 13s
File extraction (extracting 3.9GB RAR archive file using WinRAR):
Vista: 2min 16sec
XP: 2min 22sec
File extraction (extracting 1.7GB ISO file using 7zip):
Vista: 2min 05sec (64-bit version of 7zip)
XP: 2min 18sec (32-bit version of 7zip)
Program load times:
Vista:
Photoshop CS3: 2 secs
OpenOffice: 1.5 secs
Crysis: 26 secs
XP:
Photoshop CS3: 8.5 secs
OpenOffice: 6.5 secs
Crysis: 33 secs
Photoshop CS3 "Retouch artist's benchmark":
Vista: 30s
XP: 29s
3DMark06
Vista:
3DMarks: 11297
SM2.0: 5227
SM3.0: 4942
CPU: 2772
XP:
3DMarks: 11706
SM2.0: 5391
SM3.0: 5150
CPU: 2869
Crysis GPU-test (1280x1024):
Vista (”High”, DX10, 64-bit): 35fps (avg)
Vista (”High”, DX9, 64-bit): 37fps (avg)
Vista (”High”, DX10, 32-bit): 35fps (avg)
Vista (”High”, DX9, 32-bit): 36fps (avg)
Vista (”Very High”, DX10, 64-bit): 20fps (avg)
XP (”High”): 39fps (avg)
Crysis CPU-test 2 (800x600):
Vista (”Low”, except ”Physics” on high, DX9, 32-bit): 60fps (avg)
Vista (”Low”, except ”Physics” on high, DX9, 64-bit): 54fps (avg)
XP (”Low”, except ”Physics” on high): 69fps (avg)
